Tuesday, November 20, 2007

An insiders guide to how-to-vote cards


Once upon a time, I used to be a member of a now largely defunct minor Australian political party. And for a couple of elections I was one of those annoying people who stand outside the polling booth handing out how-to-vote cards.

A quick primer on how-to-vote cards:

Australia has preferential voting. When filling out a ballot paper, voters don't merely vote for one candidate, but rank all of the available candidates in order of preference. This means that you can support an unpopular candidate but still influence which of the front-runners will ultimately win. This is because if your first choice can't win, then your second choice counts as a full vote. And if your second choice can't win, then your third choice counts as a full vote, and so on.

That's how it is for the House of Representatives election, anyway. It's more complex for the Senate, although still a preferential system.

With preferential voting, voters are free to distribute preferences however they like. However, the political parties also like to make recommendations. So on election day, each party organises to have people handing out how-to-vote cards outside polling booths around Australia. These how-to-vote cards are a last ditch attempt to impress voters with a nice photo of the candidate, win their vote, and influence their preferences.

Now, the electoral act prohibits any campaigning within the designated polling booth. Therefore, how-to-vote card handerouterors (is that the term?) have to lurk outside the entrance. There's usually half a dozen at each polling location. Waiting, ready to pounce. The poor voters have to run the gauntlet.

In my experience as a handerouteror, there are 4 kinds of voters when it comes to how-to-vote cards:

1) No card McGees - these voters keep their heads down and try to run the gauntlet, refusing all how-to-vote cards.

2) Angry no card McGees - these voters refuse all cards, whilst abusing the how-to-vote-card handerouterers ("You're corrupt bloody mongrels, the lot of yehs. I'm not voting for any of yehs. Grumble grumble...")

3) Proud Partisans - refuse all cards except that of their favourite party. These voters are happy to make their allegiance known.

4) Aquiscents - take a card from all of the parties, not wanting to offend anyone.

5) Recyling Acquiescents - take a card from all of the parties, then return them on the way out, in the interests of recycling.

Why do voters have to put up with this? And aren't how-to-vote cards a huge waste of paper? Why not just change the electoral act to allow parties to poster their recommendations on the wall inside the booth? Why not just have a copy of each card available in each of the little cardboard cubicles?

There's a good answer to that actually. The major parties can afford to pay people to hand out cards at every single booth in Australia. However, the minor parties, not having much money, have to rely on party members and volunteers (like me) to hand out cards, and there's just not enough to go around. Thus, minor parties can only afford to have how-to-vote cards at some booths. The minor parties would much prefer to just post voting recommendations inside the booths. But it's only the major parties that have the power to change the electoral act.

Surprisingly, how-to-vote cards make quite a difference. My minor party did much better at booths where its how-to-vote cards were handed out.

But I wonder what effect the quintessential polling booth sausage sizzle has on election outcomes? Factor that in Antony.

P.S. For any would be handerouterors out there, a tip: the spot closest to the entrance is the best. Yours will be the last card they get, and therefore will likely be on top of the pile.

6 comments:

Lee said...

I have been a handerouteror on occasion. Not for a few years now. It can be good fun with a bit of camaraderie among the various handerouterors. Agree with your voter classification system. Spot on. The sausage sizzle? Are we talking PORK sausages here?

Mark said...

LOL, Lee! Yes, there's a ham related connection with everything.

Erk said...

Kram, I used to be a type 4 (take everything) but now I'm a type 1 (take nothing).


Even if I pre-vote, I still have to put up with the handerouteror so they have at least 2 weeks practice if they are handering out stuff every day before the election. Do these people have lives? :P


Anyhoo, do you find it strange (like I do) that we are a democracy in this country but it is compulsory to vote like in a dictatorship?


I don't like the way the media promotes the election. You'd think that the public are directly voting for the PM but as you know, you are only voting for your local member.


I actually mention this on my podcast "Erk Pod" on episode 56. I'd like your opinion.


Cheers mate, keep up the good work with the blog.

Mark said...

Hi Erk,

Well, i'm actually a fan of compulsory voting, although technically it's not compulsory *voting*, it's compulsory turn up to the booth and get your named crossed off.

But yes, it's a shame how presidential elections have become.

I'm downloading ErkPod as we speak on iTunes.

Unknown said...

I myself have handed out the propoganda for my cousin in law who was running as a Democrat (yes im brave enough to actually name them!!).

Erk said...

Ganesha, I wasn't thinking of the Democrats in relation to this story. For some reason I thought "One Nation" and maybe that's the Democrats whole problem. Apart from Nat Stott-Dehottie, who can name another Democrat?


Cheers, Kram. You are right about the fact that you have to turn up to get your name ticked off and that you don't have to vote. Going to one booth to vote is bad enough but what about those people who go (usually for political reasons) to more than one place and vote more than once?